projects
/
rrdtool.git
/ blobdiff
commit
grep
author
committer
pickaxe
?
search:
re
summary
|
shortlog
|
log
|
commit
|
commitdiff
|
tree
raw
|
inline
| side by side
we should not use C++ comments in c files
[rrdtool.git]
/
doc
/
rpntutorial.pod
diff --git
a/doc/rpntutorial.pod
b/doc/rpntutorial.pod
index
13ee0ec
..
a4fcd57
100644
(file)
--- a/
doc/rpntutorial.pod
+++ b/
doc/rpntutorial.pod
@@
-2,8
+2,6
@@
rpntutorial - Reading RRDtool RPN Expressions by Steve Rader
rpntutorial - Reading RRDtool RPN Expressions by Steve Rader
-=for html <div align="right"><a href="rpntutorial.pdf">PDF</a> version.</div>
-
=head1 DESCRIPTION
This tutorial should help you get to grips with RRDtool RPN expressions
=head1 DESCRIPTION
This tutorial should help you get to grips with RRDtool RPN expressions
@@
-15,16
+13,16
@@
The LT, LE, GT, GE and EQ RPN logic operators are not as tricky as
they appear. These operators act on the two values on the stack
preceding them (to the left). Read these two values on the stack
from left to right inserting the operator in the middle. If the
they appear. These operators act on the two values on the stack
preceding them (to the left). Read these two values on the stack
from left to right inserting the operator in the middle. If the
-resulting statement is true, the replace the three values from the
+resulting statement is true, the
n
replace the three values from the
stack with "1". If the statement if false, replace the three values
with "0".
stack with "1". If the statement if false, replace the three values
with "0".
-For example think about "2,1,GT". This RPN expression could be
+For example
,
think about "2,1,GT". This RPN expression could be
read as "is two greater than one?" The answer to that question is
"true". So the three values should be replaced with "1". Thus the
RPN expression 2,1,GT evaluates to 1.
read as "is two greater than one?" The answer to that question is
"true". So the three values should be replaced with "1". Thus the
RPN expression 2,1,GT evaluates to 1.
-Now
also
consider "2,1,LE". This RPN expression could be read as "is
+Now consider "2,1,LE". This RPN expression could be read as "is
two less than or equal to one?". The natural response is "no"
and thus the RPN expression 2,1,LE evaluates to 0.
two less than or equal to one?". The natural response is "no"
and thus the RPN expression 2,1,LE evaluates to 0.
@@
-58,14
+56,14
@@
GT, GE and EQ operators.
While compound expressions can look overly complex, they can be
considered elegantly simple. To quickly comprehend RPN expressions,
you must know the the algorithm for evaluating RPN expressions:
While compound expressions can look overly complex, they can be
considered elegantly simple. To quickly comprehend RPN expressions,
you must know the the algorithm for evaluating RPN expressions:
-iterate searches from the left to the right looking for an operator
,
-
w
hen it's found, apply that operator by popping the operator and some
+iterate searches from the left to the right looking for an operator
.
+
W
hen it's found, apply that operator by popping the operator and some
number of values (and by definition, not operators) off the stack.
For example, the stack "1,2,3,+,+" gets "2,3,+" evaluated (as "2+3")
number of values (and by definition, not operators) off the stack.
For example, the stack "1,2,3,+,+" gets "2,3,+" evaluated (as "2+3")
-during the first iteration
which
is replaced by 5. This results in
+during the first iteration
and
is replaced by 5. This results in
the stack "1,5,+". Finally, "1,5,+" is evaluated resulting in the
the stack "1,5,+". Finally, "1,5,+" is evaluated resulting in the
-answer 6. For convenience
sake
, it's useful to write this set of
+answer 6. For convenience, it's useful to write this set of
operations as:
1) 1,2,3,+,+ eval is 2,3,+ = 5 result is 1,5,+
operations as:
1) 1,2,3,+,+ eval is 2,3,+ = 5 result is 1,5,+
@@
-93,23
+91,23
@@
multiplication operator:
4) 0,7000,1024,IF result is 1024
4) 0,7000,1024,IF result is 1024
-Now let's go back to the first example of multiple logic operators
+Now let's go back to the first example of multiple logic operators
,
but replace the value 20 with the variable "input":
but replace the value 20 with the variable "input":
- 1) input,10,GT,10,input,IF eval is input,10,GT
result is A
+ 1) input,10,GT,10,input,IF eval is input,10,GT
( lets call this A )
Read eval as "if input > 10 then true" and replace "input,10,GT"
Read eval as "if input > 10 then true" and replace "input,10,GT"
-with "A:
+with "A
"
:
2) A,10,input,IF eval is A,10,input,IF
2) A,10,input,IF eval is A,10,input,IF
-read "if A then 10 else input". Now replace A it's verbose
-description and--voila!--you have a easily readable description
+read "if A then 10 else input". Now replace A
with
it's verbose
+description a
gaing a
nd--voila!--you have a easily readable description
of the expression:
if input > 10 then 10 else input
of the expression:
if input > 10 then 10 else input
-
Lastly, let's to back
the first most complex example and replace
+
Finally, let's go back to
the first most complex example and replace
the value 128 with "input":
1) input,8,*,7000,GT,7000,input,8,*,IF eval input,8,* result is A
the value 128 with "input":
1) input,8,*,7000,GT,7000,input,8,*,IF eval input,8,* result is A
@@
-155,8
+153,8
@@
by removing the redundant use of "input,8,*" like so:
input,56000,GT,56000,input,IF,8,*
input,56000,GT,56000,input,IF,8,*
-Use tradition notation to show these expressions are not the same.
-Write an expression that's equivalent to the first expression but
+Use tradition
al
notation to show these expressions are not the same.
+Write an expression that's equivalent to the first expression
,
but
uses the LE and DIV operators.
Answer 2:
uses the LE and DIV operators.
Answer 2:
@@
-183,7
+181,7
@@
Answer 3:
Exercise 4:
Exercise 4:
-Explain why it
i
s desirable for the RRDtool developers to implement
+Explain why it
wa
s desirable for the RRDtool developers to implement
RPN notation instead of traditional mathematical notation.
Answer 4:
RPN notation instead of traditional mathematical notation.
Answer 4: