X-Git-Url: https://git.octo.it/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=TODO;h=6dc00280a42c4825d5c2b7b8979b7c552c78b1eb;hb=ba776ae4b85b10c278c618cada2b0caa1c50ad03;hp=0b26441e264b2adc979e55b0600972a98ef95998;hpb=bcfcd1c3d21e333a048bbb6f629601f53e384cae;p=git.git diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index 0b26441e..6dc00280 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,226 +1,116 @@ -What to expect after 0.99.6 -=========================== +The GIT To-Do File +================== -This is written in a form of to-do list for me, so if I say -"accept patch", it means I do not currently plan to do that -myself. People interested in seeing it materialize please take -a hint. The latest copy of this document is found at + The latest copy of this document is found at http://kernel.org/git/?p=git/git.git;a=blob;hb=todo;f=TODO -Tool Renames Plan ------------------ - - - All non-binary commands will lose -script suffix in - $(bindir). The source to git-foo will be either git-foo.sh - or git-foo.perl in the source tree, and the documentation - will be in Documentation/git-foo.txt. - - - The commands whose names have 'cache' to mean 'index file' - will get 'cache' in their names replaced with 'index'. For - git-fsck-cache and git-convert-cache, 'cache' will be - replaced with 'objects'. - - - The commit walkers will have 'pull' in their names replaced - with 'fetch'. 'git-ssh-push' will become 'git-ssh-upload'. - - - We continue to follow the convention to name the C source - file that contains the main program of 'git-foo' command - 'foo.c'. That means we will have 'fsck-objects.c', for - example. - - At this moment, I am not planning to rename the symbols used - in programs, nor any library sources. "cache.h" will stay - "cache.h", so does "read-cache.c". "struct cache_entry" and - "ce_match_stat()" will keep their names. We _might_ want to - rename them in later rounds but not right now. +What to expect from now on +========================== - - In 0.99.7, all renamed commands will have symbolic links in - $(bindir) so that old names continue to work. These backward - compatible symlinks will not be present in documentation, - though. Especially, the main documentation, git(7) will talk - about the new names. Old environment names defined in - gitenv() will also be removed in this release. +This is written in a form of to-do list for me, so if I say +"accept patch", it means I do not currently plan to do that +myself. People interested in seeing it materialize please take +a hint. Also whatever I marked "Perhaps" do not have to happen +if ever -- only if somebody cares enough and submits a clean +patch, perhaps ;-). - Tentatively we aim to do this on Sep 17th. - - In 0.99.8, we do not install these backward compatible - symbolic links in $(bindir) anymore. The Makefile will have - a target to remove old symlinks from $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) you - can run manually to help you clean things up. +UI +-- - The timeframe for this is around Oct 1st, but I could be - talked into delaying the symlink removal if Porcelain people - find this schedule too tight. +* Make "git branch -d foo" while on foo branch suggest "maybe + you want to go back to 'master'?" -Documentation +Design issues ------------- -* Accept patches from people who actually have done CVS - migration and update the cvs-migration documentation. - Link the documentation from the main git.txt page. - -* Accept patches from people who were hit by shiny blue bat to - update the SubmittingPatches. +* tree entries in index? -* Talk about using rsync just once at the beginning when - initializing a remote repository so that local packs do not - need to be expanded. I personally do not think we need tool - support for this (but see below about optimized cloning). +* "intent to add" index entries? -* Maybe update tutorial with a toy project that involves two or - three developers.. +* Plug-in file-level merges. On the other hand, we may not even + need this; just tell people to run "xxdiff -U" on the working + tree files. -* Update tutorial to cover setting up repository hooks to do - common tasks. - -* Accept patches to finish missing docs. +* Doing a merge in a separate directory? Technical (heavier) ------------------- -* Tony Luck reported an unfortunate glitch in the 3-way merge. - Encourage discussions to come up with a not-so-expensive way - to catch the kind of ambiguities that led to his misery. - [Daniel's patch looks quite promising, so is the one from - Fredrik.] - -* HPA has two projects, klibc and klibc-kbuild, that have large - set of overlapping files in different paths (i.e. one has many - renames from the other). There currently is no way for git to - help keep these two trees in sync, merging criss-cross between - them. The merge logic should be able to take advantage of - rename/copy detection smarts git-diff-* family has. Linus, - me, and Daniel outlined a smarter merge strategy for this. - Try them out. - -* To make it easier to experiment with different merge - strategies, make git-merge driver that will run merge backends - for the best merge [tested and in proposed updates]. - -* We might want to optimize cloning with GIT native transport - not to explode the pack, and store it in objects/pack instead. - We would need a tool to generate an idx file out of a pack - file for this. Also this itself may turn out to be a bad - idea, making the set of packs in repositories everybody has - different from each other. - * Maybe a pack optimizer. -* Maybe an Emacs VC backend. + Given a set of objects and a set of refs (probably a handful + branch heads and point release tags), find a set of packs to + allow reasonably minimum download for all of these classes of + people: (1) somebody cloning the repository from scratch, (2) + somebody who tends to follow the master branch head reasonably + closely, (3) somebody who tends to follow only the point + releases. + + This needs a matching smart on the dumb protocol downloader. + +* Libification. There are many places "run once" mentality is + ingrained in the management of basic data structures, which + need to be fixed. [Matthias Urlichs is already working on + this: ] Technical (milder) ------------------ -* Tool renames. Give fixup patch for at least Cogito and StGIT. - [As of 2005-09-09 evening US/Pacific, the "master" branch has - what should go in 0.99.7 including gitenv() removal]. +* Shallow clones. -* Have Daniel's read-tree graduate from "pu" after plugging leaks. +* Encourage competition between annotate vs blame. Maybe come + up with some nontrivial test cases. -* Implement a merge backend using Daniel's read-tree [DONE]. +* Subprojects. Try "gitlink". -* Rename 'git-merge-resolve' to 'git-merge-stupid' and - 'git-merge-multibase' to 'git-merge-resolve'; the former is - for historical curiosity and comparison purposes only and not - to be used in real applications so remove it from the default - strategies list [DONE]. -* Accept Fredrik merge after renaming it (I want to name the - driver 'git merge'). Suggest where to place *.py stuff -- - probably in $(share)/git-core/ and add Makefile entry for - installation. +* Decide what to do about rebase applied to merged head. One + extreme is to allow rebase if "rev-list ours..theirs" gives + anything. This loosens the current merge-base based approach. + The other extreme is to refuse rebase if "rev-list + theirs..ours" contains any merge commit, which was discussed + on the list. -* Encourage concrete proposals to commit log message templates - we discussed some time ago. + <43CC695E.2020506@codeweavers.com> -* Bug Martin for archimport script documentation. +* Decide what the right thing to do upon an empty merge commit, + when both branches happen to have obtained the same set of + changes through different history. Not recording such keeps + the history simpler, and the next merge would soon create a + true merge commit anyway, but this does not feel quite right. -* More portability. + <20060114021800.4688.qmail@web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> -* Accept patches to cause "read-tree -u" delete a directory when - it makes it empty. +* diff stopping at the first output; qgit wants to know if this + tree has any A or D from the other tree and nothing else. + Would help internal tree-diff in rev-list as well. -* Perhaps accept patches to introduce the concept of "patch flow - expressed as ref mappings" Josef has been advocating about. +* daemon --strict-symlink. -* Perhaps accept patches to do undo/redo. +* daemon --base-path does not apply automatically to whitelist + somehow feels wrong. If somebody cares enough, accept + patches. -* Perhaps accept patch to optionally allow '--fuzz' in - 'git-apply'. +* Perhaps detect cloning request in upload-pack and cache the + result for next cloning request until any of our refs change. * Maybe grok PGP signed text/plain in applymbox as well. -* Perhaps a tool to revert a single file to pre-modification - state? git-cat-file blob `git-ls-files | grep foo` >foo or - git-cat-file blob `git-ls-tree HEAD foo` >foo? What should - the command be called? git-revert is taken so is - git-checkout. - -* A tool to detect, show and prune already merged topic - branches. - -* "Lost and Found"; link dangling commits found by fsck-objects - under $GIT_DIR/refs/lost-found/. Then show-branch or gitk can - be used to find any lost commit. - - Do not name it /lost+found/; that would probably confuse - things that mistake it a mount point (not our code but - somebody else's). - -* Enhance "git repack" to not always use --all; this would be - handy if the repository contains wagging heads like "pu" in - git.git repository. - -* Internally split the project into non-doc and doc parts; add - an extra root for the doc part and merge from it; move the - internal doc source to a separate repository, like the +Meta - repository; experiment if this results in a reasonable - workflow, and document it in howto form if it does. - -* Option to limit rename detection for more than N paths. - -* Marking copy seems to be broken when A,B => B,C rename - happens; we incorrectly say B stays, which makes the new B - copy of old A, not rename [DONE]. - -* Make rebase restartable; instead of skipping what cannot be - automatically forward ported, leave the conflicts in the work - tree, have the user resolve it, and then restart from where it - left off. - -* Output full path in the "git-rev-list --objects" output, not - just the basename, and see the improved clustering results in - better packing. - Technical (trivial) ------------------- -* Make 'git bisect' easier to use by logging the earlier - good/bad choices and make it replayable [DONE]. - -* Perhaps "git branch -d" to delete a branch. We probably need - some way to say "delete this branch because everything in this - should be merged in the master branch" and refuse the removal - if it is not true. - -* We would want test scripts for the relative directory path - stuff Linus has been working on. So far, the following - commands should be usable with relative directory paths: +* git-proxy should be spawned with sh -c 'command' $1 $2. - git-update-index - git-ls-files - git-diff-files - git-diff-index - git-diff-tree - git-rev-list - git-rev-parse +* test scripts for the relative directory path stuff. -* In a freashly created empty repository, `git fetch foo:bar` +* In a freshly created empty repository, `git fetch foo:bar` works OK, but `git checkout bar` afterwards does not (missing `.git/HEAD`).