X-Git-Url: https://git.octo.it/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=read-tree.c;h=ce2bb88f0aae8919f188a0dbc5f3338523151740;hb=24db845c40b09c55eb810c01e7fda2f4505d35ba;hp=cf6d28e2c9ee689a5ea49d715bc56773b266efa8;hpb=b5b425074e5f84f261b1290b1a83eca635c49147;p=git.git diff --git a/read-tree.c b/read-tree.c index cf6d28e2..ce2bb88f 100644 --- a/read-tree.c +++ b/read-tree.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static int unpack_tree(unsigned char *sha1) buffer = read_object_with_reference(sha1, "tree", &size, NULL); if (!buffer) return -1; - ret = read_tree(buffer, size, stage); + ret = read_tree(buffer, size, stage, NULL); free(buffer); return ret; } @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void reject_merge(struct cache_entry *ce) die("Entry '%s' would be overwritten by merge. Cannot merge.", ce->name); } -static int merged_entry(struct cache_entry *merge, struct cache_entry *old, struct cache_entry **dst) +static int merged_entry_internal(struct cache_entry *merge, struct cache_entry *old, struct cache_entry **dst, int allow_dirty) { merge->ce_flags |= htons(CE_UPDATE); if (old) { @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int merged_entry(struct cache_entry *merge, struct cache_entry *old, stru */ if (same(old, merge)) { *merge = *old; - } else { + } else if (!allow_dirty) { verify_uptodate(old); } } @@ -124,13 +124,168 @@ static int merged_entry(struct cache_entry *merge, struct cache_entry *old, stru return 1; } -static int threeway_merge(struct cache_entry *stages[4], struct cache_entry **dst) +static int merged_entry_allow_dirty(struct cache_entry *merge, struct cache_entry *old, struct cache_entry **dst) +{ + return merged_entry_internal(merge, old, dst, 1); +} + +static int merged_entry(struct cache_entry *merge, struct cache_entry *old, struct cache_entry **dst) +{ + return merged_entry_internal(merge, old, dst, 0); +} + +static int deleted_entry(struct cache_entry *ce, struct cache_entry *old, struct cache_entry **dst) +{ + if (old) + verify_uptodate(old); + ce->ce_mode = 0; + *dst++ = ce; + return 1; +} + +static int causes_df_conflict(struct cache_entry *ce, int stage, + struct cache_entry **dst_, + struct cache_entry **next_, + int tail) +{ + /* This is called during the merge operation and walking + * the active_cache[] array is messy, because it is in the + * middle of overlapping copy operation. The invariants + * are: + * (1) active_cache points at the first (zeroth) entry. + * (2) up to dst pointer are resolved entries. + * (3) from the next pointer (head-inclusive) to the tail + * of the active_cache array have the remaining paths + * to be processed. There can be a gap between dst + * and next. Note that next is called "src" in the + * merge_cache() function, and tail is the original + * end of active_cache array when merge_cache() started. + * (4) the path corresponding to *ce is not found in (2) + * or (3). It is in the gap. + * + * active_cache -----......+++++++++++++. + * ^dst ^next ^tail + */ + int i, next, dst; + const char *path = ce->name; + int namelen = ce_namelen(ce); + + next = next_ - active_cache; + dst = dst_ - active_cache; + + for (i = 0; i < tail; i++) { + int entlen, len; + const char *one, *two; + if (dst <= i && i < next) + continue; + ce = active_cache[i]; + if (ce_stage(ce) != stage) + continue; + /* If ce->name is a prefix of path, then path is a file + * that hangs underneath ce->name, which is bad. + * If path is a prefix of ce->name, then it is the + * other way around which also is bad. + */ + entlen = ce_namelen(ce); + if (namelen == entlen) + continue; + if (namelen < entlen) { + len = namelen; + one = path; + two = ce->name; + } else { + len = entlen; + one = ce->name; + two = path; + } + if (memcmp(one, two, len)) + continue; + if (two[len] == '/') + return 1; + } + return 0; +} + +static int threeway_merge(struct cache_entry *stages[4], + struct cache_entry **dst, + struct cache_entry **next, int tail) { struct cache_entry *old = stages[0]; struct cache_entry *a = stages[1], *b = stages[2], *c = stages[3]; struct cache_entry *merge; int count; + /* #5ALT */ + if (!a && b && c && same(b, c)) { + if (old && !same(b, old)) + return -1; + return merged_entry_allow_dirty(b, old, dst); + } + /* #2ALT and #3ALT */ + if (!a && (!!b != !!c)) { + /* + * The reason we need to worry about directory/file + * conflicts only in #2ALT and #3ALT case is this: + * + * (1) For all other cases that read-tree internally + * resolves a path, we always have such a path in + * *both* stage2 and stage3 when we begin. + * Traditionally, the behaviour has been even + * stricter and we did not resolve a path without + * initially being in all of stage1, 2, and 3. + * + * (2) When read-tree finishes, all resolved paths (i.e. + * the paths that are in stage0) must have come from + * either stage2 or stage3. It is not possible to + * have a stage0 path as a result of a merge if + * neither stage2 nor stage3 had that path. + * + * (3) It is guaranteed that just after reading the + * stages, each stage cannot have directory/file + * conflicts on its own, because they are populated + * by reading hierarchy of a tree. Combined with + * (1) and (2) above, this means that no matter what + * combination of paths we take from stage2 and + * stage3 as a result of a merge, they cannot cause + * a directory/file conflict situation (otherwise + * the "guilty" path would have already had such a + * conflict in the original stage, either stage2 + * or stage3). Although its stage2 is synthesized + * by overlaying the current index on top of "our + * head" tree, --emu23 case also has this guarantee, + * by calling add_cache_entry() to create such stage2 + * entries. + * + * (4) Only #2ALT and #3ALT lack the guarantee (1). + * They resolve paths that exist only in stage2 + * or stage3. The stage2 tree may have a file DF + * while stage3 tree may have a file DF/DF. If + * #2ALT and #3ALT rules happen to apply to both + * of them, we would end up having DF (coming from + * stage2) and DF/DF (from stage3) in the result. + * When we attempt to resolve a path that exists + * only in stage2, we need to make sure there is + * no path that would conflict with it in stage3 + * and vice versa. + */ + if (c) { /* #2ALT */ + if (!causes_df_conflict(c, 2, dst, next, tail) && + (!old || same(c, old))) + return merged_entry_allow_dirty(c, old, dst); + } + else { /* #3ALT */ + if (!causes_df_conflict(b, 3, dst, next, tail) && + (!old || same(b, old))) + return merged_entry_allow_dirty(b, old, dst); + } + /* otherwise we will apply the original rule */ + } + /* #14ALT */ + if (a && b && c && same(a, b) && !same(a, c)) { + if (old && same(old, c)) + return merged_entry_allow_dirty(c, old, dst); + /* otherwise the regular rule applies */ + } /* * If we have an entry in the index cache ("old"), then we want * to make sure that it matches any entries in stage 2 ("first @@ -161,7 +316,8 @@ static int threeway_merge(struct cache_entry *stages[4], struct cache_entry **ds * "carry forward" rule, please see . * */ -static int twoway_merge(struct cache_entry **src, struct cache_entry **dst) +static int twoway_merge(struct cache_entry **src, struct cache_entry **dst, + struct cache_entry **next, int tail) { struct cache_entry *current = src[0]; struct cache_entry *oldtree = src[1], *newtree = src[2]; @@ -183,23 +339,73 @@ static int twoway_merge(struct cache_entry **src, struct cache_entry **dst) } else if (oldtree && !newtree && same(current, oldtree)) { /* 10 or 11 */ - verify_uptodate(current); - return 0; + return deleted_entry(oldtree, current, dst); } else if (oldtree && newtree && same(current, oldtree) && !same(current, newtree)) { /* 20 or 21 */ - verify_uptodate(current); - return merged_entry(newtree, NULL, dst); + return merged_entry(newtree, current, dst); } else /* all other failures */ return -1; } else if (newtree) - return merged_entry(newtree, NULL, dst); + return merged_entry(newtree, current, dst); else - return 0; + return deleted_entry(oldtree, current, dst); +} + +/* + * Two-way merge emulated with three-way merge. + * + * This treats "read-tree -m H M" by transforming it internally + * into "read-tree -m H I+H M", where I+H is a tree that would + * contain the contents of the current index file, overlayed on + * top of H. Unlike the traditional two-way merge, this leaves + * the stages in the resulting index file and lets the user resolve + * the merge conflicts using standard tools for three-way merge. + * + * This function is just to set-up such an arrangement, and the + * actual merge uses threeway_merge() function. + */ +static void setup_emu23(void) +{ + /* stage0 contains I, stage1 H, stage2 M. + * move stage2 to stage3, and create stage2 entries + * by scanning stage0 and stage1 entries. + */ + int i, namelen, size; + struct cache_entry *ce, *stage2; + + for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) { + ce = active_cache[i]; + if (ce_stage(ce) != 2) + continue; + /* hoist them up to stage 3 */ + namelen = ce_namelen(ce); + ce->ce_flags = create_ce_flags(namelen, 3); + } + + for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) { + ce = active_cache[i]; + if (ce_stage(ce) > 1) + continue; + namelen = ce_namelen(ce); + size = cache_entry_size(namelen); + stage2 = xmalloc(size); + memcpy(stage2, ce, size); + stage2->ce_flags = create_ce_flags(namelen, 2); + if (add_cache_entry(stage2, ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD) < 0) + die("cannot merge index and our head tree"); + + /* We are done with this name, so skip to next name */ + while (i < active_nr && + ce_namelen(active_cache[i]) == namelen && + !memcmp(active_cache[i]->name, ce->name, namelen)) + i++; + i--; /* compensate for the loop control */ + } } /* @@ -208,7 +414,8 @@ static int twoway_merge(struct cache_entry **src, struct cache_entry **dst) * The rule is: * - take the stat information from stage0, take the data from stage1 */ -static int oneway_merge(struct cache_entry **src, struct cache_entry **dst) +static int oneway_merge(struct cache_entry **src, struct cache_entry **dst, + struct cache_entry **next, int tail) { struct cache_entry *old = src[0]; struct cache_entry *a = src[1]; @@ -236,6 +443,11 @@ static void check_updates(struct cache_entry **src, int nr) unsigned short mask = htons(CE_UPDATE); while (nr--) { struct cache_entry *ce = *src++; + if (!ce->ce_mode) { + if (update) + unlink(ce->name); + continue; + } if (ce->ce_flags & mask) { ce->ce_flags &= ~mask; if (update) @@ -244,11 +456,12 @@ static void check_updates(struct cache_entry **src, int nr) } } -typedef int (*merge_fn_t)(struct cache_entry **, struct cache_entry **); +typedef int (*merge_fn_t)(struct cache_entry **, struct cache_entry **, struct cache_entry **, int); static void merge_cache(struct cache_entry **src, int nr, merge_fn_t fn) { struct cache_entry **dst = src; + int tail = nr; while (nr) { int entries; @@ -266,7 +479,7 @@ static void merge_cache(struct cache_entry **src, int nr, merge_fn_t fn) break; } - entries = fn(stages, dst); + entries = fn(stages, dst, src, tail); if (entries < 0) reject_merge(name); dst += entries; @@ -275,13 +488,35 @@ static void merge_cache(struct cache_entry **src, int nr, merge_fn_t fn) check_updates(active_cache, active_nr); } -static char *read_tree_usage = "git-read-tree ( | -m [ []])"; +static int read_cache_unmerged(void) +{ + int i, deleted; + struct cache_entry **dst; + + read_cache(); + dst = active_cache; + deleted = 0; + for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) { + struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i]; + if (ce_stage(ce)) { + deleted++; + continue; + } + if (deleted) + *dst = ce; + dst++; + } + active_nr -= deleted; + return deleted; +} + +static const char read_tree_usage[] = "git-read-tree ( | -m [-u] [ []])"; static struct cache_file cache_file; int main(int argc, char **argv) { - int i, newfd, merge; + int i, newfd, merge, reset, emu23; unsigned char sha1[20]; newfd = hold_index_file_for_update(&cache_file, get_index_file()); @@ -289,6 +524,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) die("unable to create new cachefile"); merge = 0; + reset = 0; + emu23 = 0; for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { const char *arg = argv[i]; @@ -298,20 +535,38 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) continue; } + /* This differs from "-m" in that we'll silently ignore unmerged entries */ + if (!strcmp(arg, "--reset")) { + if (stage || merge || emu23) + usage(read_tree_usage); + reset = 1; + merge = 1; + stage = 1; + read_cache_unmerged(); + continue; + } + /* "-m" stands for "merge", meaning we start in stage 1 */ if (!strcmp(arg, "-m")) { - int i; - if (stage) - die("-m needs to come first"); - read_cache(); - for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) { - if (ce_stage(active_cache[i])) - die("you need to resolve your current index first"); - } + if (stage || merge || emu23) + usage(read_tree_usage); + if (read_cache_unmerged()) + die("you need to resolve your current index first"); stage = 1; merge = 1; continue; } + + /* "-emu23" uses 3-way merge logic to perform fast-forward */ + if (!strcmp(arg, "--emu23")) { + if (stage || merge || emu23) + usage(read_tree_usage); + if (read_cache_unmerged()) + die("you need to resolve your current index first"); + merge = emu23 = stage = 1; + continue; + } + if (get_sha1(arg, sha1) < 0) usage(read_tree_usage); if (stage > 3) @@ -320,15 +575,26 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) die("failed to unpack tree object %s", arg); stage++; } + if (update && !merge) + usage(read_tree_usage); if (merge) { static const merge_fn_t merge_function[] = { [1] = oneway_merge, [2] = twoway_merge, [3] = threeway_merge, }; + merge_fn_t fn; + if (stage < 2 || stage > 4) die("just how do you expect me to merge %d trees?", stage-1); - merge_cache(active_cache, active_nr, merge_function[stage-1]); + if (emu23 && stage != 3) + die("--emu23 takes only two trees"); + fn = merge_function[stage-1]; + if (stage == 3 && emu23) { + setup_emu23(); + fn = merge_function[3]; + } + merge_cache(active_cache, active_nr, fn); } if (write_cache(newfd, active_cache, active_nr) || commit_index_file(&cache_file))