Update 2005-08-30.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index e37f729..8fb166c 100644 (file)
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -28,19 +28,21 @@ Documentation
   support for this.
 
 * Review the existing docs and see if the repository
   support for this.
 
 * Review the existing docs and see if the repository

-  organization needs to be clarified further [NEXT].
+  organization needs to be clarified further [STILL NEEDSWORK].

 
 

-* Update tutorial to cover shared repository style a bit more,
-  maybe with a toy project that involves two or three
+* Update tutorial to cover shared repository style a bit more
+  [DONE], maybe with a toy project that involves two or three

   repositories.
 
 * Update tutorial to cover setting up repository hooks to do
   common tasks. [IN PROGRESS]
 
   repositories.
 
 * Update tutorial to cover setting up repository hooks to do
   common tasks. [IN PROGRESS]
 

-* Get help to properly use asciidoc in tutorial.
+* Get help to properly use asciidoc in tutorial [Heck, ended up
+  learning it myself, DONE].

 
 

-* Maybe justify and demonstrate an Octopus in the tutorial.  Add
-  it to the glossary.
+* Maybe justify and demonstrate an Octopus in the tutorial
+  [STILL NEEDSWORK].  Add it to the glossary [Thanks Johannes,
+  DONE].

 
 
 Technical (heavier)
 
 
 Technical (heavier)


@@ -49,8 +51,8 @@ Technical (heavier)
 * Tony Luck reported an unfortunate glitch in the 3-way merge.
   Encourage discussions to come up with a not-so-expensive way
   to catch the kind of ambiguities that led to his misery.
 * Tony Luck reported an unfortunate glitch in the 3-way merge.
   Encourage discussions to come up with a not-so-expensive way
   to catch the kind of ambiguities that led to his misery.

-  [Underway.  Thanks Daniel and Fredrik for taking an
-  initiative.]
+  [Daniel's patch look promising, just by judging from how clean
+  the re-organization part of read-tree looks like.]

 
 * We might want to optimize cloning with GIT native transport
   not to explode the pack, and store it in objects/pack instead.
 
 * We might want to optimize cloning with GIT native transport
   not to explode the pack, and store it in objects/pack instead.


@@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ Technical (heavier)
   different from each other.
 
 * Maybe a pack optimizer.  I am not convinced that packing all
   different from each other.
 
 * Maybe a pack optimizer.  I am not convinced that packing all

-  objects into a single pack and removing all the existing pack
+  objects into a single pack and removing all the existing panck

   is the right way to go, since that would work against people
   who already have those packs.
 
   is the right way to go, since that would work against people
   who already have those packs.
 


@@ -95,7 +97,8 @@ Technical (milder)
 
     http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ejr/gits/git.git#portable 
 
 
     http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ejr/gits/git.git#portable 
 

-  [Applied.  Burned by one of them and backed out.]
+  [Applied.  Burned by one of them and backed out, but otherwise
+  looks OK.]

 
 * Accept patches to cause "read-tree -u" delete a directory when
   it makes it empty.
 
 * Accept patches to cause "read-tree -u" delete a directory when
   it makes it empty.