From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 06:32:23 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Update 2005-08-30. X-Git-Url: https://git.octo.it/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2206927d1cca64c8a86472364aa6b0d3bcfdd13b;p=git.git Update 2005-08-30. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index e37f729c..8fb166c6 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -28,19 +28,21 @@ Documentation support for this. * Review the existing docs and see if the repository - organization needs to be clarified further [NEXT]. + organization needs to be clarified further [STILL NEEDSWORK]. -* Update tutorial to cover shared repository style a bit more, - maybe with a toy project that involves two or three +* Update tutorial to cover shared repository style a bit more + [DONE], maybe with a toy project that involves two or three repositories. * Update tutorial to cover setting up repository hooks to do common tasks. [IN PROGRESS] -* Get help to properly use asciidoc in tutorial. +* Get help to properly use asciidoc in tutorial [Heck, ended up + learning it myself, DONE]. -* Maybe justify and demonstrate an Octopus in the tutorial. Add - it to the glossary. +* Maybe justify and demonstrate an Octopus in the tutorial + [STILL NEEDSWORK]. Add it to the glossary [Thanks Johannes, + DONE]. Technical (heavier) @@ -49,8 +51,8 @@ Technical (heavier) * Tony Luck reported an unfortunate glitch in the 3-way merge. Encourage discussions to come up with a not-so-expensive way to catch the kind of ambiguities that led to his misery. - [Underway. Thanks Daniel and Fredrik for taking an - initiative.] + [Daniel's patch look promising, just by judging from how clean + the re-organization part of read-tree looks like.] * We might want to optimize cloning with GIT native transport not to explode the pack, and store it in objects/pack instead. @@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ Technical (heavier) different from each other. * Maybe a pack optimizer. I am not convinced that packing all - objects into a single pack and removing all the existing pack + objects into a single pack and removing all the existing panck is the right way to go, since that would work against people who already have those packs. @@ -95,7 +97,8 @@ Technical (milder) http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ejr/gits/git.git#portable - [Applied. Burned by one of them and backed out.] + [Applied. Burned by one of them and backed out, but otherwise + looks OK.] * Accept patches to cause "read-tree -u" delete a directory when it makes it empty.