-What to expect after 0.99.5
-===========================
+The GIT To-Do File
+==================
-This is written in a form of to-do list for me, so if I say
-"accept patch", it means I do not currently plan to do that
-myself. People interested in seeing it materialize please take
-a hint.
+ The latest copy of this document is found at
+ http://kernel.org/git/?p=git/git.git;a=blob;hb=todo;f=TODO
-Documentation
--------------
-* Accept patches from people who actually have done CVS
- migration and update the cvs-migration documentation.
- Link the documentation from the main git.txt page.
+What to expect from now on
+==========================
-* Link howto docs from the git.txt page. [DONE]
-
-* Update the SubmittingPatches document to add MUA specific
- hints on how to disable unwanted MIME and flowed-text by
- collecting past list postings. Accept patches from people who
- was hit by shiny blue bat to update the same. [NEEDSWORK]
+This is written in a form of to-do list for me, so if I say
+"accept patch", it means I do not currently plan to do that
+myself. People interested in seeing it materialize please take
+a hint. Also whatever I marked "Perhaps" do not have to happen
+if ever -- only if somebody cares enough and submits a clean
+patch, perhaps ;-).
-* Talk about using rsync just once at the beginning when
- initializing a remote repository so that local packs do not
- need to be expanded. I personally do not think we need tool
- support for this.
-* Update tutorial to cover shared repository style a bit more,
- maybe with a toy project that involves two or three
- repositories.
+Design issues
+-------------
-* Update tutorial to cover setting up repository hooks to do
- common tasks. [IN PROGRESS]
+* tree entries in index? -- sorry, stalled
-* Get help to properly use asciidoc in tutorial.
+* "intent to add" index entries? -- together with the above
+ needs rethinking.
-* Maybe justify and demonstrate an Octopus in the tutorial. Add
- it to the glossary.
+* Plug-in file-level merges. On the other hand, we may not even
+ need this; just tell people to run "xxdiff -U" on the working
+ tree files (or kompare).
Technical (heavier)
-------------------
-* Tony Luck reported an unfortunate glitch in the 3-way merge.
- Encourage discussions to come up with a not-so-expensive way
- to catch the kind of ambiguities that led to his misery.
- [Underway. Thanks Daniel and Fredrik for taking an
- initiative.]
+* Libification. There are many places "run once" mentality is
+ ingrained in the management of basic data structures, which
+ need to be fixed. [Matthias Urlichs was already working on
+ this: <pan.2005.10.03.20.48.52.132570@smurf.noris.de>, but I
+ do not know what happened to his efforts]
-* We might want to optimize cloning with GIT native transport
- not to explode the pack, and store it in objects/pack instead.
- We would need a tool to generate an idx file out of a pack
- file for this. Also this itself may turn out to be a bad
- idea, making the set of packs in repositories everybody has
- different from each other.
+* Lazy clones that can be controlled by the user, ranging from
+ totally on-demand a la CVS/SVN to "cache down to this old
+ commit so that I can make full use of git on at least recent
+ history". This need a lot of work in making tools to exit
+ gracefully when they hit unavailable objects while offline.
Technical (milder)
------------------
-* When the branch head pointed by $GIT_DIR/HEAD changes while
- the index file and working tree are looking the other way
- (e.g. somebody pushed into your repository, or you ran "git
- fetch" to update the ref your working tree is on), "git
- checkout" without -f gets confused. Figure out a good way to
- handle this. [DONE]
-
- We still have the same issue with "git fetch". Fetching into
- the branch one is on _may_ need to do the same thing as
- fetching into anonymous head and then do the resolve. At
- least it needs a warning. [NEEDSWORK]
+* duplicated refspec given to "fetch-pack a a a" makes it emit
+ strange error message because it triggers the "match only
+ once" logic. Maybe strip the dups on the input side
+ (Uwe Zeisberger
+ <20060608073857.GA5072@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>).
-* "git commit -m" should work for initial commits and perhaps
- merge commits as well. Warning about merge is still a good
- thing to do, while -m is useful in scripted non-interactive
- use, so we need to be careful. [DONE - waiting for response]
+* upload-pack support for start fetching from any valid point on
+ the history, not just published refs. (Erik W. Biederman
+ <m164jc9ekx.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>)
-* Encourage concrete proposals to commit log message templates
- we discussed some time ago.
+* git-daemon side support for virtual hosting. Client side
+ is ready in 1.4.0 (Jon Loeliger <1149610100.23938.75.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>).
-* Bug Ryan and work with him to update send-email easier to use.
- [Resurrected it for Debian build.]
+* teach git-upload-pack not to ack-continue early when the
+ client has roots it does not know about but it already has
+ learned the fork points for all the requested heads
+ (Ralf Baechle <20060524131022.GA11449@linux-mips.org>).
-* Look at portability fixes from Jason Riedy
+* Per user .gitconfig across repositories -- ongoing.
- http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ejr/gits/git.git#portable
+* Encourage competition between annotate vs blame. Maybe come
+ up with some nontrivial test cases.
- [Looked at it. Maybe promising. Maybe not.]
+* Subprojects. Try "gitlink" -- sorry, stalled.
-* Accept patches to cause "read-tree -u" delete a directory when
- it makes it empty.
+* Rebase and checkout -m should be able to use recursive
+ strategy as well. These commands currently do not work across
+ renames.
-* Perhaps accept patches to introduce the concept of "patch flow
- expressed as ref mappings" Josef has been advocating about.
+* Decide what to do about rebase applied to merged head. One
+ extreme is to allow rebase if "rev-list ours..theirs" gives
+ anything. This loosens the current merge-base based approach.
+ The other extreme is to refuse rebase if "rev-list
+ theirs..ours" contains any merge commit, which was discussed
+ on the list.
-* Perhaps accept patches to do undo/redo.
+ <43CC695E.2020506@codeweavers.com>
-* MIMEified applymbox to grok B and Q encodings in headers and
- turn them into UTF-8; unwrap QP; explode multipart.
+* Decide what the right thing to do upon an empty merge commit,
+ when both branches happen to have obtained the same set of
+ changes through different history. Not recording such keeps
+ the history simpler, and the next merge would soon create a
+ true merge commit anyway, but this does not feel quite right.
-* "git cherry-pick" that applies the patch an existing commit
- introduces in its ancestry chain, possibly using the 3-way
- merge machinery. [Done. Needs documentation.]
+ <20060114021800.4688.qmail@web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
-* Update rebase using the cherry-pick command. [Done]
+* diff stopping at the first output; qgit wants to know if this
+ tree has any A or D from the other tree and nothing else.
+ Would help internal tree-diff in rev-list as well.
-* Redo "git revert" using 3-way merge machinery. [Done]
+* daemon --strict-symlink.
-* A tool to detect, show and prune already merged topic
- branches.
+* daemon --base-path does not apply automatically to whitelist
+ somehow feels wrong. If somebody cares enough, accept
+ patches.
-* Set up an automated documentation rebuilding procedure at
- kernel.org, using update hook mechanism. [Almost, but not
- quite.] Describe it in a howto form [Done].
+* Perhaps detect cloning request in upload-pack and cache the
+ result for next cloning request until any of our refs change.
-* Enhance "git repack" to not always use --all; this would be
- handy if the repository contains wagging heads like "pu" in
- git.git repository.
-
-* Internally split the project into non-doc and doc parts; add
- an extra root for the doc part and merge from it; move the
- internal doc source to a separate repository, like the +Meta
- repository; experiment if this results in a reasonable
- workflow, and document it in howto form if it does.
-
-* Add names to all nodes in show-branch.
+* Maybe grok PGP signed text/plain in applymbox as well.
Technical (trivial)
-------------------
-* Look at and merge Debian fixes from Tommi [Done].
-
-* Perhaps "git branch -d" to delete a branch.
+* git-proxy should be spawned with sh -c 'command' $1 $2.
-* Remove "git clone-dumb-http".
+* Maybe a true git-proxy command that reads the first request
+ pkt-line, and redirects the request to its real destination.
-* We would want test scripts for the relative directory path
- stuff Linus has been working on. So far, the following
- commands should be usable with relative directory paths:
+* test scripts for the relative directory path stuff.
- update-cache
- ls-files
- diff-files
- diff-cache
- diff-tree
- rev-list
+* In a freshly created empty repository, `git fetch foo:bar`
+ works OK, but `git checkout bar` afterwards does not (missing
+ `.git/HEAD`).
\f
Local Variables:
projects / git.git / blobdiff