Currently curl_json will barely ignore boolean values in a non erroneous

way, so that if you have an array like this:
you will be able to access the 123 number like

We now rather call our number parser with 0 for false, 1 for true.

diff --git a/src/curl_json.c b/src/curl_json.c
index 756f24f..07d575e 100644 (file)
--- a/src/curl_json.c
+++ b/src/curl_json.c
@@ -226,11 +226,6 @@ static void cj_advance_array(cj_t *db) {
 #define CJ_CB_ABORT 0
 #define CJ_CB_CONTINUE 1
 
-static int cj_cb_boolean(void *ctx, int boolVal) {
-  cj_advance_array(ctx);
-  return CJ_CB_CONTINUE;
-}
-
 static int cj_cb_null(void *ctx) {
   cj_advance_array(ctx);
   return CJ_CB_CONTINUE;
@@ -292,6 +287,14 @@ static int cj_cb_string(void *ctx, const unsigned char *val, yajl_len_t len) {
   return cj_cb_number(ctx, (const char *)val, len);
 } /* int cj_cb_string */
 
+static int cj_cb_boolean(void *ctx, int boolVal) {
+  if (boolVal) {
+   return (cj_cb_number (ctx, "1", 1));
+  } else {
+   return (cj_cb_number (ctx, "0", 1));
+ }
+} /* int cj_cb_boolean */
+
 static int cj_cb_end(void *ctx) {
   cj_t *db = (cj_t *)ctx;
   memset(&db->state[db->depth], 0, sizeof(db->state[db->depth]));