projects
/
git.git
/ commitdiff
commit
grep
author
committer
pickaxe
?
search:
re
summary
|
shortlog
|
log
|
commit
| commitdiff |
tree
raw
|
patch
|
inline
| side by side (parent:
63c4a8a
)
Update TODO 2006-01-07 late night.
author
Junio C Hamano
<junkio@cox.net>
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:11:29 +0000
(22:11 -0800)
committer
Junio C Hamano
<junkio@cox.net>
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:11:29 +0000
(22:11 -0800)
TODO
patch
|
blob
|
history
diff --git
a/TODO
b/TODO
index
4135038
..
b766239
100644
(file)
--- a/
TODO
+++ b/
TODO
@@
-76,7
+76,7
@@
Technical (milder)
------------------
* send-pack/receive-pack protocol updates, to allow the receiver
------------------
* send-pack/receive-pack protocol updates, to allow the receiver
- to report what it did to the ref update requests.
+ to report what it did to the ref update requests
[DONE]
.
* Perhaps a smarter HTTP anonymous download via CGI.
* Perhaps a smarter HTTP anonymous download via CGI.
@@
-97,9
+97,7
@@
Technical (milder)
ls-tree might be easier to use if it matched diff, not
ls-files.
ls-tree might be easier to use if it matched diff, not
ls-files.
- [We should not do this, or do this carefully, if we were to
- merge the "git-checkout (--|<tree>) <path> work from
- subdirectory" patch.]
+ [DONE, with --full-name option like ls-files]
* Any Porcelain-ish we forgot or punted to make usable from
subdirectory? I think the last pass caught everything and
* Any Porcelain-ish we forgot or punted to make usable from
subdirectory? I think the last pass caught everything and
@@
-131,15
+129,22
@@
Technical (milder)
just the basename, and see the improved clustering results in
better packing [Tried, but did not work out well].
just the basename, and see the improved clustering results in
better packing [Tried, but did not work out well].
+* Daemon --base-path does not apply automatically to whitelist
+ somehow feels wrong. If somebody cares enough, accept
+ patches.
+
Technical (trivial)
-------------------
Technical (trivial)
-------------------
+* Daemon --base-path forbidding user-path automatically feels
+ wrong. If somebody cares enough, accept patches.
+
* Versioning scheme. The next maintenance installment will be
* Versioning scheme. The next maintenance installment will be
- 1.0.3 not 1.0.0c. The next feature release would be 1.1.0.
+ 1.0.3 not 1.0.0c. The next feature release would be 1.1.0
[DONE]
.
* Either drop supporting Debian myself or coerce patches out of
* Either drop supporting Debian myself or coerce patches out of
- the official maintainer.
+ the official maintainer
[DONE -- DROPPED]
.
* We would want test scripts for the relative directory path
stuff Linus has been working on. Most of the C-level
* We would want test scripts for the relative directory path
stuff Linus has been working on. Most of the C-level